- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 12:10:52 +0100
- To: Adrian Gschwend <adrian.gschwend@zazuko.com>, public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <f17d4d73-09b2-17ea-2d75-1ddabf2e8ba4@w3.org>
On 02/03/2023 11:14, Adrian Gschwend wrote: > On 01.03.23 19:07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >> The minutes from last week - >> https://www.w3.org/2023/02/23-rdf-star-minutes.html - need to be >> fixed up. The agenda items there do not reflect the discussion that >> occurred, making it hard to find relevant discussion when looking >> over minutes of past meetings. > > that's because some don't follow the agenda. If this is not acceptable > I will play bad cop but don't complain about me if I do so. > > I don't think it makes sense to change the agenda for the reason that > it was ignored in the discussion. I think Peter is not suggesting to change the agenda, but to change the section titles in the minutes, to better reflect what was actually discussed. > >> There are other meetings that have the same problem, e.g., >> https://www.w3.org/2023/02/09-rdf-star-minutes.html. It used to be >> that scribes edited the automatically-generated minutes to fix >> problems like these. This editing phase should be reinstated. I'm >> willing to go through older minutes and make these fixes if someone >> gives me the power to do so. > > @Pierre-Antoine what is the standard way for that? Peter, as you volunteered ;) you could simply download the HTML files, edit them locally, and I will reflect the changes on the W3C server. Processwise, I guess we would then need to vote on this minute again. best > >> It would be very useful to have a pointer to the minutes of previous >> meetings, currently being automatically generated in >> https://www.w3.org/services/meeting-minutes?channel=rdf-star&num=200 > > Where in what form? > > regards > > Adrian >
Attachments
- application/pgp-keys attachment: OpenPGP public key
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2023 11:10:57 UTC