- From: Thomas Lörtsch <tl@rat.io>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:29:59 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
> On 24. Jan 2023, at 14:37, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 24/01/2023 00:19, Thomas Lörtsch wrote:
>
>> Apache Jena, Documentation Support of RDF-star > https://jena.apache.org/documentation/rdf-star/> > SELECT ?name
> { <<:john foaf:name ?name >> dct:source<http://example/directory> }> > B.t.w., the page also says:> "Translating back to RDF-star relies on the consistency constraint> that there is only one reification for each unique quoted triple term."
> Out of context.
For LPG use cases, yes - that’s why I started the quote with "b.t.w.". But it is a noteworthy hint at the pitfalls of a type based approach. To make the translation back complete you could introduce an extra triple creating an occurrence (maybe even using Pierre-Antoine's recently introduced vocabulary of "mention" etc, although I highly doubt that's practical).
Thomas
>
> "... functions to translate RDF-star into RDF reification,"
>
> It is a quoted triples to reification translation.
>
> "Translating *back* ..."
>
> It does not work on arbitrary use of reification to RDF-star, only what it created in the first place.
>
> Andy
>
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2023 14:30:24 UTC