- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 16:25:46 -0800
- To: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <03A3B10E-C919-4436-ACAE-2B6D75B776FA@greggkellogg.net>
I’ve pushed up and merged the initial content for the remaining RDF specs, and pushed up boilerplate content for the SPARQL documents. All the documents referenced from the Set of Documents [1] should de-reference with essentially the 1.1 content modulo the updates I described for Concepts.
RDF 1.2 Recommendations:
What’s New in RDF 1.2 <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-new/spec/>
RDF 1.2 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (this document)
RDF 1.2 N-Quads <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-n-quads/spec/>
RDF 1.2 N-Triples <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-n-triples/spec/>
RDF 1.2 Primer <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-primer/spec/>
RDF 1.2 Schema <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-schema/spec/>
RDF 1.2 Semantics <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-semantics/spec/>
RDF 1.2 TriG <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-trig/spec/>
RDF 1.2 Turtle <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-turtle/spec/>
RDF 1.2 XML Syntax <https://w3c.github.io/rdf-xml/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Recommendations:
What’s New in SPARQL 1.2 <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-new/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Concepts <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-concepts/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Query Language <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-query/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Update <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-update/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Service Description <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-service-description/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Federated Query <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-federated-query/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Query Results JSON Format <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-results-json/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Query Results CSV and TSV Formats <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-results-csv-tsv/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Query Results XML Formats <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-results-xml/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Entailment Regimes <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-entailment/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Protocol <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-protocol/spec/>
SPARQL 1.2 Graph Store HTTP Protocol <https://w3c.github.io/sparql-http-rdf-update/spec/>
Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>
[1] https://w3c.github.io/rdf-concepts/spec/#related
> On Jan 16, 2023, at 11:31 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>
> I pushed the first of the RDF specs to GitHub, which you can see at https://w3c.github.io/rdf-concepts/spec. This is essentially just RDF 1.1 Concepts with minor updates for references and updated ReSpec. I did create a “Set of Documents” section [1], which is intended to be shared among all the specs, and will automatically note “this document”. Common files go into the /spec/common directory, although there’s no easy way I know of to synchronize them between the different repositories (Git submodules are certainly a possibility, but may be more trouble then they’re worth).
>
> Additionally, I made a number of fixes to definitions, while preserving any old fragment identifiers so that documents which may link to, say, #dfn-nodes will still go to the right place, even though the proper exported term is #dfn-node. Also, in some cases there are terms defined duplicately in different specs (e.g., “entailment-regime” (#dfn-entaiilment-regime) should be defined in RDF Semantics, not RDF Concepts, which you may debate).
>
> I haven’t otherwise addressed 1.2 vs 1.1 issues, and the former editors, acknowledges, and changes sections are largely untouched. At some point, issues should be created for Errata, and RDF-star updates that should be made in this, and other, specs.
>
> ReSpec supports a term indexing feature, which you can see at [2] which we can use, at least temporarily, to note terms defined in this spec, and imported from other specs.
>
> There is also a problem ReSpec reports ("ReSpec doesn't support expanding this kind of reference.”), which seems to be a ReSpec bug introduced by creating temporary bibliographic entries, and is reported at [3]. Presumably, the error will go away when the issue is addressed.
>
> Based on feedback to this general layout (no normative updates intended), I can upload other RDF documents which use a similar structure.
>
> Note that I will not be on the Thursday call this week, due to travel.
>
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>
> [1] https://w3c.github.io/rdf-concepts/spec/#related
> [2] https://w3c.github.io/rdf-concepts/spec/#index
> [3] https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/4362
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2023 00:26:11 UTC