- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 19:02:09 -0500
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
The comment below by Olaf caused me to realize that RDF-star already allows consolidation of provenance, as follows: << s p o >> prov:provenance :p1 . << s2 p2 o2 >> prov:provenance :p1 . :p1 prov:source :nyt ; prov:date "2023" ; prov:strength 1.0 . # It's the New York Times, after all! No need to have any sort of multi-triple construct. peter On 12/14/23 18:41, Olaf Hartig wrote: [...] > > What should happen if someone writes the following two lines? > > :occurrenceName rdf:occurrenceOf << :s1 :p1 :o1 >> . > :occurrenceName rdf:occurrenceOf << :s2 :p2 :o2 >> . > > Should the abstract syntax contain a constraint by which such a multi-use of :occurrenceName is defined to be invalid? Or should this be treated as an inconsistency under whatever entailment regime that is concerned with such rdf:occurrenceOf statements? > > Thanks, > Olaf [...]
Received on Saturday, 16 December 2023 00:02:15 UTC