Re: strange terms defined by reference in RDF Semantics

On 4/4/23 17:17, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 2023, at 2:13 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider 
>> <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/4/23 17:09, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>>>> On Apr 4, 2023, at 1:40 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider 
>>>> <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> RDF Semantics has citations of RDF Schema and SPARQL Entailment Regimes.
>>>>
>>>> In H.2 Terms defined by reference there ends up
>>>>
>>>> [ RDF12-SCHEMA ] defines the following:
>>>>
>>>>    RDF 1.2 Schema
>>>>
>>>> [ SPARQL12-ENTAILMENT ] defines the following:
>>>>
>>>>    SPARQL 1.2 Entailment Regimes
>>>>
>>>> This looks like a bug.  How can I get rid of the terms?
>>> If you click on the link in the “Terms defined by reference” section, it 
>>> should take give you a link to each place that term is used. For RDF 1.2 
>>> Schema, it is used in the Abstract, Set of Documents, and Informative 
>>> references sections. As every documnent in our set if iin the Set of 
>>> Documents section, they will all show as informative references.
>>> Gregg
>>
>>
>> But how do I keep the citations and get rid of these extraneous terms?
> 
> The terms are directly related to the citations, as I mentioned elsewhere. I 
> don’t believe there’s any way to cite documents without ReSpec creating 
> something like a term.
> 
> Note that the two sections in the Index: “Terms defined by this specification” 
> and “Terms defined by reference” could be considered more of an editing aid, 
> and we may decide to not keep them long term; but, they are useful to see what 
> terms are being defined or used. Personally, I find this useful and don’t 
> think it’s a problem.
> 
> Gregg

If there is no way to use ReSpec links without creating these extraneous terms 
how can I remove them from the documents I am editing?   I don't want to 
having something published with my name on it that I find embarrassing.

peter

Received on Friday, 7 April 2023 12:06:31 UTC