Re: agenda+ Process for FPWD.

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
• Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 06:49:42 -0400
• To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <2970b0de-d301-0ddb-bf10-ac962fd35d5b@gmail.com>

Part of the process should be looking at the references for each document. 
It appears that the transformation in how citations are done has had the 
effect of significantly changing the references, including moving some 
references between informative and normative.

peter


Is it possible to

On 3/27/23 07:35, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Could we have a slot to go over the mechanics of FPWD so that the right 
> preparation can be done?
> 
> I've tried to run through the details (from Editors guide) on some SPARQL 
> documents.
> 
> It's looking good but it depends on details such as warnings and errors that 
> are reported (some causes of broken links appear to be beyond our documents 
> for example).
> 
>      Andy
> 

Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2023 10:49:49 UTC