Re: normative vs informative references in RDF Semantics

• From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
• Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 09:49:26 -0700
• To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
• Cc: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <318DF33A-B5EF-44AA-8CA6-28FE578947C5@greggkellogg.net>

> On Apr 4, 2023, at 9:00 AM, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com> wrote:
> 
> I noticed that there are quite a few references in RDF Semantics that are in the normative section but that are not normative at all (i.e., nothing in RDF Semantics depends on them).  How can I change these references to informative?

Use `[[?ref]]` for an informative reference and `[[!ref]]` to force a normative reference. Otherwise, ReSpec creates either normative or informative depending on the section it’s referenced in.

(Same with data-cite).

Gregg

> peter
> 

Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2023 16:49:51 UTC