- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:51:17 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 16 December 2022 15:51:21 UTC
Hi Peter, On 15/12/2022 17:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > The talk about whether or not owl:sameAs should be considered when > thinking about RDF-star is a bit disconcerting as the mapping that > provides semantic for RDF-star has aspects that are only interesting > when there is a mechanism like owl:sameAs that can require that the > denotations of two IRIs are identical. Given this, it seems to me > that owl:sameAs should be considered when discussing any aspect of > RDF-star. If I remember correctly, the RDF 1.1 WG discussed at some point the possiblity of including owl:sameAs (or an equivalent rdf:equals) in the core RDF semantics, but in the end decided against it. We can definitely reopen the question, though. > > > peter > > >
Received on Friday, 16 December 2022 15:51:21 UTC