- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:04:16 +1000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
(Thread continued in duplicate at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-shacl/2017Oct/0004.html) Holger On 10/10/2017 20:03, Roman Evstifeev wrote: > Hi. I found one confusing exmaple in the shacl core spec: > > In the "and" constraint description, there is an example shape graph > (https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#AndConstraintComponent) > > ========= > ex:SuperShape > a sh:NodeShape ; > sh:property [ > sh:path ex:property ; > sh:minCount 1 ; > ] . > > ex:ExampleAndShape > a sh:NodeShape ; > sh:targetNode ex:ValidInstance, ex:InvalidInstance ; > sh:and ( > ex:SuperShape > [ > sh:path ex:property ; > sh:maxCount 1 ; > ] > ) . > ========= > > In this example sh:and combines two shapes - one is > node shape (ex:SuperShape) and another is a property shape > (written inline). Does it make any sense? > > I thought that the second shape should also be node shape. > i.e. replace > > [ > sh:path ex:property ; > sh:maxCount 1 ; > ] > > with: > > [ > a sh:NodeShape ; > sh:property [ > sh:path ex:property ; > sh:maxCount 1 ; > ] > ] > > Is this right? Or am i missing something? >
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2017 23:04:41 UTC