W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > April 2015

Re: vote for supporting "closed shapes"

From: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:29:39 -0700
Cc: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org, Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>, Iovka Boneva <iovka.boneva@univ-lille1.fr>
Message-Id: <1BCED894-0728-4437-977D-91FA40B10CF8@syapse.com>
To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
My usual practice is to start the email with:

“This is a [personal] formal/informal comment about
  http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-shacl-ucr-20150414/ <http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-shacl-ucr-20150414/> 
[section X] [on behalf of …]


I specify personal or not to clarify whether , if it is not personal I often will identify the related role or organization.
- this helps the WG to understand where the comment is coming from, and what weight to give it

The URL is crucial to ensure that there are not crossed wires of the sort that Irene was suspecting.

The use of formal or informal is to tie in with W3C process. The WG is required to formally address all formal comments about the recommendation track documents. Since this is a burden, I prefer to make informal comments except when I have significant skin in the game.


> On Apr 27, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> is there a more formal way how to make those comments

Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 19:30:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:41 UTC