- From: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:24:46 -0400
- To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>, <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
- CC: Iovka Boneva <iovka.boneva@univ-lille1.fr>
Erik, If UCR says to send comments to the list, then I believe you are using the right venue. To me your e-mail didn¹t come through clearly as a comment on the SHACL UCR because you said in response to Iovka¹s email about ShEX capabilities: "if all of this is already part of the requirements, then i think that's excellent. i started this thread because arnaud told me that this feature was not yet part of the requirements." It would have been much clearer if you said ³I reviewed SHACL UCR and I do not see this requirement captured². I am glad we have clarified this now. Irene Polikoff On 4/27/15, 3:13 PM, "Erik Wilde" <dret@berkeley.edu> wrote: >hello all. > >On 2015-04-24 08:58, Irene Polikoff wrote: >> It looks like there is some confusion around whether this discussion is >> about requirements for the future RDF Data Shapes (SHACL) standard or >> about ShEx and its variants: > >yes, and my apologies for being unnecessarily confusing. > >> Erik, I believe, is wanting to support a requirement for SHACL. Further >> complicating the matter is that Erik deferred in his requirement >> description to the recently published (outside of the working group) >>ShEx >> questionnaire. > >i was simply lazily referring to the useful explanation in the ShEx >questionnaire, without it making clear enough that all i wanted to do is >refer to the explanation of open/closed/constrained shapes. > >> Since RDF Data Shapes (SHACL) working group has now published its first >> public draft of the Requirements and Use Cases deliverable, I believe it >> would be best to make SHACL requirements contribuitions in a form of the >> review comments for this document. This would help to eliminate >>confusion. > >i agree, but that's what i was trying to do. the UCR spec says that >comments should be sent to this list, and so i did. is there a more >formal way how to make those comments, other than sending email to this >list? > >thanks and cheers, > >dret. > >-- >erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 | > | UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) | > | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 19:25:25 UTC