Re: Schema strictness

BTW, if any member of the list attends the SEMANTiCS conference [1], we are
organizing a "linked data quality" workshop [2].
We'll be happy to meet you and discuss any quality issues in person.

Best,
Dimitris


[1] http://semantics.cc
[2] http://ldq.semanticmultimedia.org/


On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Dimitris Kontokostas <
kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <
> jelabra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  At this moment, ShEx does not have the notion of different levels of
>>>>> validation. I mean, the current implementations take a strict "yes/no"
>>>>> approach to validation.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> Thanks for the info. Do you have this in your agenda for the near future?
>>>
>>
>> Eric has plans to charter a working group on this, so I think it will
>> depend on how does the working group evolve.
>>
>> In my opinion what you are doing with RDFUnit and Databugger could be an
>> interesting use case which would provide very valuable inputs and could
>> influence the agenda of the Shape Expressions spec...
>>
>
> i'll be glad to help in this regard.
> fyi, Databugger & RDFUnit are the same. Initially we went with Databugger
> but got too many complaints for the "bugger" part.  A few months ago we
> decided to rename the project to RDFUnit
>
> Best,
> Dimtiris
>
>
>>
>> Best regards, Jose Labra
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dimitris Kontokostas
> Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
> Research Group: http://aksw.org
> Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
>



-- 
Dimitris Kontokostas
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Research Group: http://aksw.org
Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas