- From: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:18:34 +0300
- To: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-sha." <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 10:19:57 UTC
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com> wrote: > At this moment, ShEx does not have the notion of different levels of >>>> validation. I mean, the current implementations take a strict "yes/no" >>>> approach to validation. >>>> >>> >> Thanks for the info. Do you have this in your agenda for the near future? >> > > Eric has plans to charter a working group on this, so I think it will > depend on how does the working group evolve. > > In my opinion what you are doing with RDFUnit and Databugger could be an > interesting use case which would provide very valuable inputs and could > influence the agenda of the Shape Expressions spec... > i'll be glad to help in this regard. fyi, Databugger & RDFUnit are the same. Initially we went with Databugger but got too many complaints for the "bugger" part. A few months ago we decided to rename the project to RDFUnit Best, Dimtiris > > Best regards, Jose Labra > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Research Group: http://aksw.org Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 10:19:57 UTC