- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:40:39 +0200
- To: <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
On 7 Aug 2014 at 01:00, Holger Knublauch wrote: > On 8/7/14, 6:16 AM, David Booth wrote: >> 3. In Section 4 (Deliverables), change "OPTIONAL - Compact, >> human-readable syntax" to "Compact, human-readable syntax", i.e., make >> it required. >> >> REASON: I think a compact, readable syntax is important. Writing >> validation rules in RDF would be simpler than writing them in SPARQL, >> but still much more tedious than having a concise, compact syntax for >> expressing them. > > Several people here on this list have stated that they disagree with > making this deliverable mandatory, because it is quite possible that the > RDF-based syntaxes are sufficient. It is also quite possible that the > group finds the opposite, and we need a shorter syntax. But we don't > know at this stage, so the deliverable should remain OPTIONAL and the > decision be left to the WG. +1 -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 07:41:13 UTC