W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Suggested charter changes

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:00:22 +1000
Message-ID: <53E2B386.2090005@topquadrant.com>
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org

On 8/7/14, 6:16 AM, David Booth wrote:
> 3. In Section 4 (Deliverables), change "OPTIONAL - Compact, 
> human-readable syntax" to "Compact, human-readable syntax", i.e., make 
> it required.
> REASON: I think a compact, readable syntax is important.  Writing 
> validation rules in RDF would be simpler than writing them in SPARQL, 
> but still much more tedious than having a concise, compact syntax for 
> expressing them.
Several people here on this list have stated that they disagree with 
making this deliverable mandatory, because it is quite possible that the 
RDF-based syntaxes are sufficient. It is also quite possible that the 
group finds the opposite, and we need a shorter syntax. But we don't 
know at this stage, so the deliverable should remain OPTIONAL and the 
decision be left to the WG.

Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 23:00:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:40 UTC