> > Sure there are lots of ways of proceeding. You may believe that > without-reasoning is better. I may believe that with-reasoning is better. >From my pov inference and validation are two different things, although they can complement each other in many cases. >From a Validation Standard perspective, mentioning the use of inferencing as a pre/post validation step option is perfectly fine, enforcing it is a completely different thing. [clipped] > PS: DBpedia is a very poor examplar for showing anything with respect to > applying inferences because it automatically applies certain inferences and > not others. Excuse me but my inference experience is limited and when you mentioned "RDFS closure" I though you were referring only to RDFS inferencing (not OWL inferencing). Dimitris Dimitris -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Research Group: http://aksw.org Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
Received on Friday, 1 August 2014 09:40:22 UTC