W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation

From: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:39:23 +0300
Message-ID: <CA+u4+a2bY=Z9mPT1AjK_LGLPQh0zxDyV9rzAmmhb0gb-oU=g6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
> Sure there are lots of ways of proceeding.  You may believe that
> without-reasoning is better.  I may believe that with-reasoning is better.

>From my pov inference and validation are two different things, although
they can complement each other in many cases.
>From a Validation Standard perspective, mentioning the use of inferencing
as a pre/post validation step option is perfectly fine, enforcing it is a
completely different thing.


> PS:  DBpedia is a very poor examplar for showing anything with respect to
> applying inferences because it automatically applies certain inferences and
> not others.

Excuse me but my inference experience is limited and when you mentioned
"RDFS closure" I though you were referring only to RDFS inferencing (not
OWL inferencing).



Dimitris Kontokostas
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Research Group: http://aksw.org
Received on Friday, 1 August 2014 09:40:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:40 UTC