- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 13:06:43 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Sam Ruby wrote: > ... >> * There are concerns that if we go too crazy in these supplemental >> documents with re-defining things that don't need to be redefined, we >> will accidentally fragment RDFa. If we push this stuff out too soon, >> before it is ready, we could create fragmentation. > > I am concerned that people are "going too crazy" in deploying both content and tooling without a proper definition, and that inevitably means that fragmentation has already occurred, and the longer the proper documentation is lacking, the greater the fragmentation will be and the harder it will be to address. > > Am I unique in having this concern? No. >> ... >> * There should be one set of processing rules for all HTML family >> languages, if possible. > > +1 +1 as well. Which reminds me of the fact that RDFa-in-XHTML already breaks this by making @rel a CURIE instead of a safe-CURIE. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 23 May 2009 11:07:33 UTC