Re: HTML 4 Profile for RDFa from Toby Inkster on 2009-05-14 (public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from May 2009)

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:19:16 +0100
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Cc: RDFa Community <public-rdfa@w3.org>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1242325156.15673.240.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk>

On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 12:41 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote:
> You can find the latest version at 
> http://www3.aptest.com/standards/rdfa-html/

For XMLLiterals which aren't well-formed would it be a good compromise
to say that the literal should still be generated as normal (i.e.
including tags) but just shouldn't be given an rdf:XMLLiteral datatype?

e.g.

	<p property="rdfs:comment">Hello<br>World</p>

Generates:

	<rdf:Description about="">
	  <rdfs:comment>Hello&lt;br&gt;World</rdfs:comment>
	</rdf:Desciption>

This makes it more consistent with XHTML+RDFa.

-- 
Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>

Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 18:20:03 UTC