- From: Holger Knublauch <yahoo@knublauch.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:29:04 -0700
- To: Othar Hansson <othar@google.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
> I'm the tech lead on this project at Google. Please keep feedback > (details or big picture) coming on this list, or email me privately. Thanks for fixing the rdf:Property (was: rdfs:Property) bug so quickly. But there is another detail: The superclass rdf:Resource does not exist - it's rdfs:Resource. Furthermore, why do none of the "datatype" properties such as countryName define a range? rdfs:Literal would clarify that the properties cannot point to other resources. Or xsd:string etc. And the namespace is really weird. Please drop the rdf.xml from the namespace. Finally, all names in this vocabulary should carry rdfs:comments and rdfs:labels to make it easier for people to use them in editing tools. Anyway, it's great to see that Google is starting to support RDF and RDFa! Holger --- TopQuadrant, Inc. http://www.topquadrant.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 20:29:53 UTC