- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:22:51 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Ben Adida wrote: > > In addition, this proposal *specifically* conflicts with RDFa by reusing > RDFa attributes (i.e. @property) with a different interpretation. In > other words, of all possible approaches to the problem, the HTML5 group > chose an approach that specifically conflicts with the only other > existing W3C spec for the given use cases. I think this may be a W3C > first. > > I absolutely cannot live with that. > > I note, as a side point, that it's fairly clear this conflict was by > design (since it was said that @property is "borrowed from RDFa"). In > other words, whereas typical W3C groups go out of their way to prevent > conflict with other specs, this group is currently actively creating > conflict. I've renamed the property="" attribute to itemprop="". -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 23:22:11 UTC