- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:47:57 -0400
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Sam Ruby wrote: > > I believe we need to work together. If you are not willing to do that > -- and furthermore, if "That's the point of the RDFa IG" -- then lets > make this interesting. I, Sam Ruby, do hereby publicly oppose the > formation of such an IG. I believe that the W3C has for too long > operated in a dysfunctional manner by NOT addressing issues head on, and > instead facilitating confusion[1] by creating overlapping groups with > unclear boundaries and missions, and in this case with the apparent > expressed purpose of avoiding addressing the underlying issue. > > I believe that Mike and I have expressed the way we would like to see > things progress: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Jun/0132.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Jul/0017.html > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Jul/0018.html > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Jul/0019.html With Manu's publishing of the first public Editors Draft of RDFa for HTML5[1], my concerns have been fully addressed and now I support the formation of an RDFa IG, should there still be a desire for there to be one. - Sam Ruby [1] http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/07/13/html5rdfa/
Received on Monday, 13 July 2009 17:48:38 UTC