Re: Test 0005 has a safe CURIE in @href

Mark, All,

Wondering if someone ever has looked at [1]  - please tell me what
information is missing there ...

And yes, Manu's Test Harness is based on the manifest document, which is,
btw, per RDFa TF decision the only normative source ;)

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/


> From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:39:43 +0100
> To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
> Cc: RDFa TF list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Test 0005 has a safe CURIE in @href
> Resent-From: RDFa TF list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:40:26 +0000
> 
> Hi Manu,
> 
>> The following page will show you all of the currently approved test
>> cases for RDFa. Anything not in the list (when you first load the page)
>> is not an approved test case for RDFa:
>> 
>> http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/
> 
> The problem is though, that although I knew your test harness existed,
> I couldn't find it via 'a search engine'. Everything I could think of
> to search for, took me ultimately to these two locations:
> 
>   <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/>
>   <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/>
> 
> As it happens, I now see that these are the correct tests, it's just
> that I also needed to read the manifest file to determine the status
> of each test. :)
> 
> So whilst you are right when you say:
> 
>   The following page will show you all of the currently approved test
>   cases for RDFa. Anything not in the list (when you first load the
>   page) is not an approved test case for RDFa:
> 
> I think we should make it clear whether your statement is true because
> your test harness is the definitive location, or whether your
> statement is true because you always keep it up to date, and some
> other location is definitive.
> 
> If the latter, and the links I referred to above are 'definitive'.
> then it might be useful to make that a bit clearer, and maybe even put
> a simple readme in that root directory. Any chance of that, Michael?
> :)
> 
> Anyway, thanks to all for directing me towards the manifest file...I'm
> now back on track.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mark
> 
> -- 
> Mark Birbeck, webBackplane
> 
> mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com
> 
> http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck
> 
> webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number
> 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street,
> London, EC2A 4RR)
>

Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 14:44:57 UTC