- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:28:23 -0400
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- CC: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Hi Andy, I've hit an issue with Jena/sparql.org... trying to find the root of the issue. The e-mail thread that kicked off contacting you can be found here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0027.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0029.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0032.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0033.html Basically, when @parseType is used to express an XML Literal in RDF/XML instead of @datatype, the SPARQL query that checks for the typed XML Literal fails. Does Jena add an XML Literal type to data that is read in with a @parseType of "Literal"? Dave, I cc'ed you in case you might know of anything that would cause this graph comparison to not work. -- manu -- Manu Sporny President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: DB Launches Medical Record Sales Service with Shepherd Medical http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/02/24/health2trade/
Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 13:29:27 UTC