- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:25:38 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Well - I called the Markup Language XHTML+RDFa 1.0. I suspect this document as a whole should be 1.0 as well. Ivan Herman wrote: > Ben, > > personally, I am happy with Mark's response. Also, his text hints at > something that we may want to do more 'official' in those responses, > namely that there are issues and features whose solution are not > absolutely clear, therefore have not been included into this release > following the 80/20 rule, and that there is an intention to continue > the RDFa work beyond this (although we do not know how, when, and > where). This may be the appropriate answer for a number of issues raised. > > This raises a procedural question, though, that we may want to address > (Ralph is much more aware of the various issues here). Should we call > this RDFa or RDFa 1.0? By thinking about versioning ahead of time we > may save some headaches in the future... > > Ivan > > Ben Adida wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> Laurens Holst raised a couple of interesting issues: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/109 >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/110 >> >> which Mark answered in: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0311.html >> >> >> Folks on the task force, please skim the issues and Mark's response, >> and let me know with a +1 if you think this is a sufficient response, >> or -1 if you'd like to discuss this further. >> >> -Ben >> > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 10:26:22 UTC