Re: record of non-telecon today

Dear Ralph,

Ok, can we schedule the next call? on Ben's availability of course.
I'm sorry for my low partecipation in this period due to hard word
duty. I hope I'll be free in few time.

Cheers,
Simone

On Nov 29, 2007 6:33 PM, Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Ben had sent regrets yesterday privately to a couple of us and none
> of us picked up the ball to propose an agenda for today.  On irc we
> decided that Ben was a critical resource to discuss our most critical
> open issue, so the consensus was not to have a telecon today:
>
> [[
>   16:14:02 [ShaneM]
>       sorry - I was on a call. do we have anything we can discuss without ben herE?
>   16:14:08 [ShaneM]
>       and ivan?
>   16:14:13 [Ralph]
>       wondering that myself
>   16:14:27 [Ralph]
>       I suggest perhaps not
>   16:14:40 [ShaneM]
>       I concur.
> ]]
> -- http://www.w3.org/2007/11/29-rdfa-irc#T16-14-02
>
> During the non-meeting I added the @instanceof issue [1] to tracker
> so others who might use the RDFa issue list [2] to judge our status
> have better information.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/66
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/products/2
>
>
>



-- 
Simone Onofri
http://www.siatec.net/

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 18:56:59 UTC