- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:12:42 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
I've copied the test data into the test area, correcting mimetype info See http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/pendinglist#hcard-rdfa1 I think this clarifies why the unknown-media-type test is informative. It seems to me that: a) the GRDDL spec normatively declares what to do with application/rdf+xml output from an XSLT transform Any other mimetype MAY be processed by a GRDDL-aware agent. We now have three tests exhibiting this: - turtle parse as triples - unknown do nothing - text/html do GRDDL process Note that the last, even though it is GRDDL is not required by the spec. Jeremy Shane McCarron wrote: > > Nice work! Note that neither the source document in [1], nor the > generated xhtml+rdfa in [2], are quite valid. The first is missing a > DOCTYPE declaration, and the second is missing the DOCTYPE with an > internal subset to declare the additional xmlns attributes. (We know > that is inelegant and are working on it, but in the interests of having > test cases be valid...) > > [1] > http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/hGRDDL/hCard.html > > [2] > http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/hGRDDL/hCardRDFa.html > > > If you need assistance making these documents valid XHTML, please let me > know. > -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 12:13:20 UTC