- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:04:38 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, HTML WG <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <461C9696.7050801@w3.org>
Dear all, my apologies for chiming in here, although I am not part of the HTML WG. But I do follow the RDFa work very closely.... I am not sure what the role of this document really is. *If* it is (part of) the technical specification of RDFa, then I am a bit surprised by some facts. For example: - Section 3: the role of the hreflang, hrefmedia, hreftype attributes. These have never been discussed in terms of RDFa lately, I am not sure what their meaning is in terms of RDF (and I am not sure they should have any meaning!). [To avoid any misunderstandings: in abstract these do make sense, it is the context that bothers me!] - Section 4: some of the examples listed here seem to go beyond the current content model of HTML, namely the fact that a meta element can have a child, that it refers to the element being the child of 'link'. It also refers to a list of predefined values in the XHTML2 namespace. The current direction of RDFa is *not* to bind it to XHTML2; this is a crucial point in the deployment strategy of RDFa - I also have the impression that we got to a nice equilibrium point on the literal datatype discussion on the mailing list (see the thread starting at [1]), but this is not reflected in the document (maybe I have just missed it). *If* the goal is to have a meta module for XHTML2, that is fine with me and I am not at my place to make any comments (although the document should make it very clear the context of this document). But if the goal is to issue an *XHTML1* module for RDFa with the minimal possible changes and with no dependency on XHTML2 then I fear this document will raise some eyebrows... My concern is, again, the wide adoption of RDFa ASAP, that is why I allowed myself to chime in. Sincerely Ivan [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Mar/0096.html Shane McCarron wrote: > > As per my implied action item from earlier today, note that an Editor's > Draft of the xhtml-rdfa module document is available at > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-xhtml-rdfa-20070402/ > > This draft is not yet connected to the main MarkUp page, nor to the new > Drafts area we are setting up. Once established, I will send out a > subsequent note. > > Finally, note that if you create documents using the example markup > language as defined in Appendix C, using the DOCTYPE with public and > system identifiers as specified therein: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml+rdfa-1.dtd"> > > such documents can validate using the W3C validation service > automatically. I trust this is what people were looking for. > > I look forward to feedback on this early draft! > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 08:04:26 UTC