- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:57:57 -0400
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, HTML WG <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>
Shane McCarron wrote: > huh? You can specify any xmlns prefixing you want. There is a syntax > and an internal subset needed if you want to do it, but its pretty > trivial. What are you trying to accomplish? Try putting an xmlns on any element except the HEAD, and the validator will complain. I think it's a DTD validation weirdness, nothing to do with your DTD specifically. > Actually, NO. XHTML 1.1 should only ever be served as > application/xhtml+xml. There is no provision for serving that document > type as text/html because it is not, in fact, HTML. We did indeed > define a hack for XHTML 1.0 that permitted it being served as text/html > if certain restrictions were observed. This has been widely viewed as a > very bad thing. Okay, I'm not up to speed on this discussion, I only know that IE and Google don't treat application/xhtml+xml correctly... but if that's what XHTML 1.1 requires, then I have nothing more to add :) -Ben
Received on Monday, 2 April 2007 18:56:27 UTC