Re: RDFa reliance on namespace declaration

Le 06-06-18 à 20:59, Mark Birbeck a écrit :
> the XSLT lists; the only reason I feel compelled to keep responding is
> that the underlying assumption of your points is that we need to drop
> QName use from XHTML. (RDFa is just one use of QNames in XHTML 2.)

Hmmm :)
I don't think you disagree that much Ian and Mark, quite the opposite  
but with a different scope. And it's why it's very important to  
specify the version of XHTML/HTML you are using in all cases.

* What Ian is proposing in
	Towards Copy and Paste eRDF
	June 13, 2006 @ 6:37 pm
http://iandavis.com/blog/2006/06/towards-copy-and-paste-erdf
is a mechanism which makes it usable with HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0.

* Mark is proposing a system which is only usable with XHTML 2.0

Each time, you are discussing, it would be better to state clearly  
your scopes.

(PS: I'm not taking position for one or the other solution)


-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Monday, 19 June 2006 02:11:29 UTC