- From: Laurian Gridinoc <laurian@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:57:12 +0000
- To: "Ian Davis" <iand@internetalchemy.org>
- Cc: "public-rdf-in-xhtml task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hello, Another issue with copy-paste (not the authoring ease described by Ian Davis), would be what happens when the user aggregates by copy-paste chunks from several pages. Google Notebook and Flock (in web snippets) discards RDFa, but other tools may not (and probably they should not). Flock and probably other "blog this" extensions will link back with blockquote/@cite, other will just not provide the source; but for the case the source is provided either by the copy-paste procedure, either by a purple number, should a RDFa parser follow it and retrieve namespace declarations? Example: <blockquote cite="http://benlog.com/"> If you quote content from this site, you should cite <a rel="cc:citeURL" property="dc:title" href="http://benlog.com">Benlog</a> by <span property="cc:attributedTo">Ben Adida</span> </blockquote> Should a such extractor use the @cite as a breadcrumb and fetch the original resource in the search of cc namespace? What if we already have another cc namespace declared? Cheers, -- Laurian Gridinoc, purl.org/net/laur
Received on Monday, 19 June 2006 21:57:22 UTC