- From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 21:02:47 -0400
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Karl Dubost wrote: > > Le 06-06-09 à 07:29, Elias Torres a écrit : >> Is this it? >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12 >> >> If so, http://svn.rdflib.net/trunk/ revision *784* has a fix for those >> (and so does my website http://torrez.us/rdfa). > > Yes this is it. Just be careful to the case sensitivity > [[[ > These link types are case-insensitive, i.e., "Alternate" has the same > meaning as "alternate". > ]]] Thanks. I've added to the latest version, but when I convert to xhtml:stylesheet should I add a #? http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml#stylesheet > > And as the discussion we had in this thread about validity, I was > browsing the test files, > > For example this is not valid XHTML 1.0 > http://svn.rdflib.net/trunk/test/rdfa/000001.htm > > No surprise there, I'm sure. That's been the crux of the discussion for a while now. I'm just sitting here tight waiting for it to be resolved. ;) -Elias
Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 01:03:04 UTC