- From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:35:05 -0400
- To: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
(Note: we're not getting into details of the spec, so I suggest that we take the SWBPD list off the cc: list. I'm leaving it on for now to make sure that SWBPD folks who want to follow the thread can follow it on public-rdf-in-xhtml. But whoever answers this thread next, please take SWBPD off the cc list.) > Thanks. I've added to the latest version, but when I convert to > xhtml:stylesheet should I add a #? > > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml#stylesheet That is, in fact, a question we have to resolve. The XHTML namespace as is is not RDF friendly, as it ends in neither a # nor a /. Thus, the default XHTML hGRDDL property may need to use a different namespace URI.... that's okay, it will all be defined in the hGRDDL transform for XHTML1, and XHTML2 (each will have its own transform.) Elias: the best way to proceed for now is to assume an RDF-friendly URI for a default namespace, and see where this leads. Your implementation is going to help us iron out these bugs. CALL FOR HELP: if there are folks interested in hacking code, now's the time that the RDFa effort could use significant help! As you can see, we're planning on developing hGRDDL transforms for XHTML1, XHTML2 (these will transform the existing defaults, like rel="next"), microformats, and eRDF. These transforms shouldn't be hard to write, but as we write them, we're going to discover all sorts of small issues to fix. Now's the time to get into the game and help us improve the RDFa spec! -Ben
Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 12:35:23 UTC