- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:26:26 +0900
- To: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Le 06-06-09 à 07:29, Elias Torres a écrit :
> Is this it?
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12
>
> If so, http://svn.rdflib.net/trunk/ revision *784* has a fix for those
> (and so does my website http://torrez.us/rdfa).
Yes this is it. Just be careful to the case sensitivity
[[[
These link types are case-insensitive, i.e., "Alternate" has the same
meaning as "alternate".
]]]
And as the discussion we had in this thread about validity, I was
browsing the test files,
For example this is not valid XHTML 1.0
http://svn.rdflib.net/trunk/test/rdfa/000001.htm
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 00:27:00 UTC