- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:49:06 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
This sounds fine to me Ivan --- Ivan Herman Tel:+31 641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) On 26 Mar 2013, at 23:14, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > Okay, here's my plan: > > 1. I've moved the errata document to errata.html in the group's CVS tree. So all the editors can now update it. That access isn't likely to go away. (It's available on the Web at http://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata since that's what the RECs point to) > > 2. Everyone who wants to be involved in errata handling should subscribe to public-rdf-dawg-comments. Probably you already are. I've noted this on the WG homepage. > > 3. When a comment comes in, people should talk about it on that list until consensus is reached, then document that consensus in errata.html. Ivan Herman (as Semantic Web Activity Lead) is responsible for making sure that happens, but editors are encouraged to go ahead and handle it themselves if it's clear what to do. > > Sound okay? > > BTW, I updated the group's home page, trying to make it something a little more suitable for eternity. > > -- Sandro > > > On 03/26/2013 12:27 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >> >> On 26/03/13 16:15, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>> On 03/26/2013 12:02 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> The process documented on the errata page is that Ivan Herman will >>> handle the errata, consulting people as necessary. I'm not sure that's >>> the best option, since he wasn't in the WG. >> >> OK -- that's the formal aspect, I was suggesting an informal consolidation. >> >>> >>> Are you available to help, via CVS, or a page on another wiki, or >>> something? >> >> Yes, any/all of those. >> >>> >>> -- Sandro >>> >>> >>>> Andy >
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 06:50:01 UTC