- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:35:06 +0100
- To: "sandro@w3.org" <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: "birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de" <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE8016434812C70@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
Thanks Sandro, BTW, I believe this one should also get a yellow box: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/ best, Axel From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] Sent: Dienstag, 26. März 2013 22:00 To: Polleres, Axel Cc: birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de; public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Subject: Re: flag or redirect the old RECs ? On 03/26/2013 08:37 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: On 03/25/2013 03:17 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote: Same here... +1 Okay, I'm hearing consensus on this, so I'll go ahead with it. Done. See: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/ You may need to shift-reload since these have a long cache time. -- Sandro Axel -----Original Message----- From: Birte Glimm [mailto:birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de] Sent: Sonntag, 24. März 2013 12:18 To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org<mailto:public-rdf-dawg@w3.org> Subject: Re: flag or redirect the old RECs ? +1 to the yellow box. Birte On 21 March 2013 15:36, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com><mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: On 21/03/13 13:35, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: On Mar 21, 2013 9:28 AM, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org<mailto:sandro@w3.org> <mailto:sandro@w3.org><mailto:sandro@w3.org>> wrote: > > Take a look at this: > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/ >> > Notice the yellow box? Should we do that for >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ I think we should do this for the query specification in particular. +1 Redirection would be OK but leaving it in place with an additional yellow box linking to the new query document is my preference. Andy - Chime -- Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm Tel.: +49 731 50 24125 Inst. of Artificial Intelligence Secr: +49 731 50 24258 University of Ulm Fax: +49 731 50 24188 D-89069 Ulm birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de<mailto:birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de> Germany
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 07:36:05 UTC