RE: flag or redirect the old RECs ?

Thanks Sandro,



BTW, I believe this one  should also get a yellow box:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/




best,

Axel





From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org]
Sent: Dienstag, 26. März 2013 22:00
To: Polleres, Axel
Cc: birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de; public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Subject: Re: flag or redirect the old RECs ?



On 03/26/2013 08:37 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:

On 03/25/2013 03:17 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:



Same here... +1


Okay, I'm hearing consensus on this, so I'll go ahead with it.


Done.  See:

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/


You may need to shift-reload since these have a long cache time.

       -- Sandro










Axel




-----Original Message-----
From: Birte Glimm [mailto:birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de]
Sent: Sonntag, 24. März 2013 12:18
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org<mailto:public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: flag or redirect the old RECs ?

+1 to the yellow box.

Birte

On 21 March 2013 15:36, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com><mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:




On 21/03/13 13:35, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:




On Mar 21, 2013 9:28 AM, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org<mailto:sandro@w3.org>
<mailto:sandro@w3.org><mailto:sandro@w3.org>> wrote:
  >
  > Take a look at this:
  >
  >> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  >>
  > Notice the yellow box?   Should we do that for
  >>
  >> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/


I think we should do this for the query specification in particular.


+1

Redirection would be OK but leaving it in place with an additional
yellow box linking to the new query document is my preference.

         Andy




- Chime



--
Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm            Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
Inst. of Artificial Intelligence         Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
University of Ulm                         Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
D-89069 Ulm                               birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de<mailto:birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>
Germany