Re: book-keeping & suggesting some PROPOSALs to approve per email

On 18/12/12 10:29, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in query as per
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0210.html

+1
And change already in the editors' working draft.

> PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in Overview as per
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0209.html

+1

>
>   PROPOSED: remove all unapproved test cases from the manifests (and
> move them to a separate folder for “unapproved” test cases)

+1

> If a sufficient quorum has time and enthusiasm to gather on IRC today at
> the regular time, maybe some of the things can be sorted out/further
> discussed there quickly (unfortunately, I won’t be able to make it).
> Otherwise, just in case, if we have any concerns on  the proposals above
> which we can’t sort out per email I suggest:
>
> PROPOSED:  Telco:  15 Jan 2013,  Time of Call: 15:00 UK
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2011&month=09&day=20&hour=10:00&min=00&sec=0&p1=43>,
> 10:00 (East US) … if any of the proposals above raises objections

agreed

	Andy

>
> FWIW, I vote “+1” to all of the above.
>
> Best  regards,
>
> Axel
>
> p.s.: this does not yet contain any proposal on how to proceed with the
> comment we got on the protocol validator, cf.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0006.html
> ... hope this will sorty out per email, if
>
> someone more swapped in could take care, it’d be appreciated!
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 11:10:44 UTC