- From: Arthur Keen <AKeen@algebraixdata.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 20:03:56 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 20:05:20 UTC
I support the DATATYPE() and the grammar changes referenced. On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: Hello RDF Working Group, The SPARQL Working Group has published a Last Call Working Draft of SPARQL 1.1 Query at: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/ The SPARQL Working Group has assembled a test suite and begun to collect implementation reports, and we expect to transition this specification directly to Proposed Recommendation upon successful completion of a Last Call that lasts until August 21, 2012. We'd kindly like to ask the RDF WG to review this Last Call document and send us any comments that you might have. If you'd prefer not to review this document, please let us know that as well. In particular, we'd appreciate any input on: * http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#func-datatype specifies that the DATATYPE() function should return rdf:langString for language-tagged literals. This is currently an at-risk portion of the SPARQL document as we monitor RDF WG progress. +1 * http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#grammar specifies grammar changes intended to align with RDF WG changes to Turtle. This is currently an at-risk portion of the SPARQL document. +1 thanks very much, Lee on behalf of the SPARQL WG
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 20:05:20 UTC