- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:05:54 -0400
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <503395C2.1000009@thefigtrees.net>
Hello again, dear RDF Working Group, Could you please let us know if the RDF WG intends to complete a review of the SPARQL 1.1 Query LCWD? We'd appreciate a response before we decide to advance the specification, even if there will not be a formal review. many thanks, Lee On 7/31/2012 10:53 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Hello RDF Working Group, > > The SPARQL Working Group has published a Last Call Working Draft of > SPARQL 1.1 Query at: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/ > > The SPARQL Working Group has assembled a test suite and begun to > collect implementation reports, and we expect to transition this > specification directly to Proposed Recommendation upon successful > completion of a Last Call that lasts until August 21, 2012. > > We'd kindly like to ask the RDF WG to review this Last Call document > and send us any comments that you might have. If you'd prefer not to > review this document, please let us know that as well. > > In particular, we'd appreciate any input on: > > * http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#func-datatype specifies that > the DATATYPE() function should return rdf:langString for > language-tagged literals. This is currently an at-risk portion of > the SPARQL document as we monitor RDF WG progress. > * http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#grammar specifies grammar > changes intended to align with RDF WG changes to Turtle. This is > currently an at-risk portion of the SPARQL document. > > > thanks very much, > Lee > on behalf of the SPARQL WG >
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 14:06:27 UTC