- From: Paul Gearon <pgearon@revelytix.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:29:49 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
It appears that I have a scheduling conflict myself this week. Will try to catch up over email. Paul On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI. I have a conflict and will not be able to attend today's > teleconference, except for via IRC (and will probably have to leave > early) > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Andy Seaborne > <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 24/04/12 00:52, Gregory Williams wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 23, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> >>>> I have been making progress on the property path changes. I hope to >>>> integrate in new text (with outstanding @@s) into the doc in the next few >>>> days so everyone can see what the structure will be. >>>> >>>> Some tests in tests/data-sparql11/property-path/ will be invalidated and >>>> some need updating. >>> >>> >>> I can help out with updating the tests. >> >> >> Great - I need to sort out ARQ code first -- I know some tests are now >> invalid syntax but I want to create an implementation that is a direct >> implementation of the spec so it's as likely to be right as possible, rather >> than using a more complex implementation that tries to be clever (I often do >> this to check the "clever" one against the "simple" one.) >> >> Andy >> >>> .greg >>> >>> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 13:30:29 UTC