RE: references from Overview (was Re: Overview document (ACTION-595))

>  2) Putting something like
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/r2
>     auto-generated and adapted to the SPARQL1.1 test cases in 
> the appendix.
> 
> Best,
> Axel 
> 

P.s.: I can try to prepare that, but not before end of next week.
So, if we want to publish now, I'd suggest to get out CSV/TSV and GSP now
and publish Overview along the 2nd LC of Query

Best,
Axel

 
-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres 
Siemens AG Österreich 
Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research & Technologies 
CT T CEE 
 
Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983 
Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859
Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Polleres, Axel 
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2012 3:16 PM
> To: Sandro Hawke
> Cc: SPARQL Working Group
> Subject: RE: references from Overview (was Re: Overview 
> document (ACTION-595))
> 
> > suite?"  My answer to that would be Yes, Absolutely, but it 
> should be 
> > something a little more friendly than 
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/summary.html
> >
> 
> How about adapting that one:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html
> as follows:
> 
>  1) Explaining how to run the tests in a separate new section
>  2) Putting something like
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/r2
>     auto-generated and adapted to the SPARQL1.1 test cases in 
> the appendix.
> 
> Best,
> Axel 
> 
> --
> Dr. Axel Polleres
> Siemens AG Österreich
> Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research & 
> Technologies CT T CEE 
>  
> Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983
> Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859
> Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2012 3:11 PM
> > To: Polleres, Axel
> > Cc: SPARQL Working Group
> > Subject: references from Overview (was Re: Overview document 
> > (ACTION-595))
> > 
> > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 00:43 +0200, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >  
> > > while I didn't do changes on the overview doc as of yet, 
> > I'd like to 
> > > highlight things that might need discussion before we can 
> go to LC:
> > >  
> > > 1)  Reference to:
> > > "
> > > Using SPARQL1.1 with RDF1.1 - SPARQL1.1 is based on the Resource 
> > > Description Framework (RDF) specifications in their 2004 
> > version. This 
> > > document describes how SPARQL1.1 is to be used with RDF1.1, 
> > which is 
> > > currently under development. (Note: this is a placeholder at the
> > > moment.)
> > > "
> > >  
> > > * Will we progress this document to at least a note?
> > 
> > Without having thought about this a lot, I suggest we have 
> > the Overview just link a web page (maybe 
> > http://www.w3.org/2012/sparql11-and-rdf11 or
> > 2009/sparql/rdf11) and for now that can redirect to the wiki 
> > page, but later if we make it a WG Note, we can switch the 
> > redirect to be there.
> > 
> > > 2) Reference in Section 11
> > >  
> > > Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language, ed. Dave Beckett and Tim 
> > > Berners-Lee, W3C Team Submission 28 March 2011. (See
> > > http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/.)
> > >  
> > > * Can we keep that and change it later on, as Turtle 
> becomes a Rec 
> > > from the RDF WG?
> > 
> > Since there's already a WD, let's use that.  
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle
> > 
> > That will update in place to the REC.
> > 
> > 
> > Also, there's, "@@@Shall this document also link to the test 
> > suite?"  My answer to that would be Yes, Absolutely, but it 
> > should be something a little more friendly than 
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/summary.html
> > 
> > Maybe we can make a short web page that talks about the 
> test suite and
> > then links there.   I'm not sure whether to use a wiki or 
> non wiki URL
> > for that.   I guess I'd pick non-wiki.    Maybe 
> > 2009/sparql/test-suite.
> > 
> >      -- Sandro
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>

Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 13:19:34 UTC