Re: draft response to DB-6

Looks good:

&SHOULD; ==> *should*

	Andy

On 31/10/11 15:01, Gregory Williams wrote:
> With the decision to rename two of the Service Description properties [1], I believe DB-6 has now been fully addressed. I'd appreciate someone taking a look at the response [2].
>
> thanks,
> .greg
>
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011OctDec/0037.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DB-6
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 10:26:38 UTC