draft response to DB-6

With the decision to rename two of the Service Description properties [1], I believe DB-6 has now been fully addressed. I'd appreciate someone taking a look at the response [2].

thanks,
.greg


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011OctDec/0037.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DB-6

Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 15:02:35 UTC