- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:47:03 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Looks good to me.
- Steve
On 2011-10-24, at 04:56, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Please let me know if this response is OK to send:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:HS-1
>
> Andy, I made the following changes to your draft response:
>
> * Explicitly indicated that ARQ's results for the query in question ("query 2") are correct
>
> * Suggest that the commenter check with specific implementers if he finds queries that do not behave as he expects, or as the WG's test suite dictates
>
> * Removed any response to the bit about the Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL paper as not needing an explicit response from our WG.
>
>
> thanks,
> Lee
>
--
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 07:47:28 UTC