- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:31:22 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Looks good to me as well,
Thanks
Andy
On 24/10/11 08:47, Steve Harris wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> - Steve
>
> On 2011-10-24, at 04:56, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
>> Please let me know if this response is OK to send:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:HS-1
>>
>> Andy, I made the following changes to your draft response:
>>
>> * Explicitly indicated that ARQ's results for the query in question ("query 2") are correct
>>
>> * Suggest that the commenter check with specific implementers if he finds queries that do not behave as he expects, or as the WG's test suite dictates
>>
>> * Removed any response to the bit about the Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL paper as not needing an explicit response from our WG.
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Lee
>>
>
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 10:32:04 UTC