comment response HS-1

Please let me know if this response is OK to send:

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:HS-1

Andy, I made the following changes to your draft response:

* Explicitly indicated that ARQ's results for the query in question 
("query 2") are correct

* Suggest that the commenter check with specific implementers if he 
finds queries that do not behave as he expects, or as the WG's test 
suite dictates

* Removed any response to the bit about the Semantics and Complexity of 
SPARQL paper as not needing an explicit response from our WG.


thanks,
Lee

Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 03:57:14 UTC