- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:23:28 +0200
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all, I have collected changes in the update doc at: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/PostLastCall#Update The points listed there IMHO woudl *not* reuqire a second last call for Update so far since changed only a mior (but obvious) error in a definition and otherwise reformulated text only to match the definitions or clarify matters. What remains open is as far as I can see two things: 1) the PREFIX "reuse" proposal of DB-9 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Sep/0004.html) ... which only indirectly affects Update, I just wrote a mail about it (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011OctDec/0060.html) 2) I am not sure about DB-5 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0017) which is assigned to Paul whether it contains anything mission-critical, but it superficially looks like it'd only need editorial action. Please let me know if you have more, Axel
Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 21:23:57 UTC