- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:09:41 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 17/10/11 21:50, Axel Polleres wrote: > Another comment that seems to need discussion: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Sep/0004.html > > Here, a proposal is made for bootstrapping prefixes by allowing to > reuse prefix definitions in later prefix definitions. I don't find > anything in my records whether this has been discussed yet, but my > impression is that, though an interesting proposal, this may be too > late in the process. Will such redefinition of prefixes be allowed in > RDF1.1? "Redefinition" is the wrong word: PREFIX ex: <http://example/1> PREFIX ex: <http://example/2> It's legal in SPARQL 1.0 and (implied) in Turtle. David is asking for definition using earlier prefix declarations. The published RDF-WG WD is: http://www.w3.org/2010/01/Turtle/#sec-grammar-grammar and so the current state is "no". Andy > > Axel > >
Received on Monday, 17 October 2011 21:10:11 UTC