- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:46:44 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Proposal 1: +1 Proposal 2: +1 Proposal 3: -1 Prefer to exclude anything not required from the grammar, but not really that bothered. - Steve On 2011-09-29, at 14:13, Matthew Perry wrote: > Proposal 1: +1 > Proposal 2: 0 > Proposal 3: 0 > > I would be fine with leaving the others in the Grammar. > > - Matt > > On 9/29/2011 9:06 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> Reduce the number of library (required) functions to >> >> Please put your (+1 | 0 | -1) on each of: >> >> Proposal 1: >> SHA1 >> MD5 >> >> Proposal 2: >> SHA1 >> MD5 >> SHA256 >> >> Proposal 3: >> SHA1 >> MD5 >> SHA256 >> SHA512 >> >> Proposal 4: >> Other (with details) >> >> >> Variations: leave the other functions in as "informative, not required" and leave the keywords in the grammar. >> >> Andy >> > > -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 13:47:15 UTC