- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:30:58 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Thanks Andy and Sandro for the efforts! Axel On 13 Sep 2011, at 13:53, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 08:46 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > > On 13/09/11 00:47, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 19:30 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > >> I've created a new last call version (after Axel's fix today - thx) > > >> > > >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results-lc2.html > > >> > > >> Guessed publication date of 14/September and 6 weeks last call period. > > >> These need checking/changing when the details are decided. > > > > > > I've asked for a pub date, but haven't heard back. Hopefully it'll be > > > the 13th, but if not, I expect it'll be the 15th. > > > > Great - thanks > > And the answer is: the 15th. (Is it bad luck to publish on a 13th?) > > > > Do we want to take out the cvs log before publication? I'd be inclined > > > to, but don't really care. > > > > Removed and in CVS json-results-lc3 so it's switchable - as the comments > > are not at the formally tracked stage yet, it'll be clearer to remove > > the CVS log used while drafting so the changes post-pub are clear. > > Great. > > - s > > > > > > > Also, technically this is a First Public and Last Call Working Draft, so > > > we'll need to add some words to that effect. I can do that. The > > > pubrules checker will complain that FPWD's shouldn't have a "previous > > > version" link, but we can/should ignore that complaint. > > > > > > -- Sandro > > > > > >> Andy > > > > Andy > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 13:31:33 UTC