Re: regrets for tomorrow

On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 08:46 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> 
> On 13/09/11 00:47, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 19:30 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >> I've created a new last call version (after Axel's fix today - thx)
> >>
> >>     http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results-lc2.html
> >>
> >> Guessed publication date of 14/September and 6 weeks last call period.
> >> These need checking/changing when the details are decided.
> >
> > I've asked for a pub date, but haven't heard back.  Hopefully it'll be
> > the 13th, but if not, I expect it'll be the 15th.
> 
> Great - thanks

And the answer is: the 15th.    (Is it bad luck to publish on a 13th?)

> > Do we want to take out the cvs log before publication?   I'd be inclined
> > to, but don't really care.
> 
> Removed and in CVS json-results-lc3 so it's switchable - as the comments 
> are not at the formally tracked stage yet, it'll be clearer to remove 
> the CVS log used while drafting so the changes post-pub are clear.

Great.

   - s

> >
> > Also, technically this is a First Public and Last Call Working Draft, so
> > we'll need to add some words to that effect.  I can do that.  The
> > pubrules checker will complain that FPWD's shouldn't have a "previous
> > version" link, but we can/should ignore that complaint.
> >
> >       -- Sandro
> >
> >>  Andy
> 
>  Andy
> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 11:54:11 UTC